| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> > So:
> >
> > "If a robot does not play exactly one chip in the game board before signaling
> > 'End Of Turn', or the robot drops a chip outside the board, which interferes
> > with the opponent, the offending robot will forfeit the game"
>
>
> I can not see in my mind how not not placeing a chip can be an advantage. and
> even if you can show me, the thought that someone might program for that
> scenario just breaks the KISS rule.
>
> if people want to do that..... then so be it.
Has this question been answered? Will robots be allowed to not make a play?
(unintentionally or otherwise)
And, has a method of communication been decided upon? (IR or sensor toggle)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: C$
|
| (...) Given recent analysis of the game this should NOT be allowed. You must play or forfeit. (...) Sensor Toggle. Derek (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: C$
|
| (...) wow Steve, you must be SO PROUD!!! you beat your son at connect-four, for "almost all the games" (...) I can not see in my mind how not not placeing a chip can be an advantage. and even if you can show me, the thought that someone might (...) (21 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
