To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 16664
16663  |  16665
Subject: 
Re: TTT board marks or not
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:18:16 GMT
Viewed: 
1127 times
  
I don't think the line needs to be wide, because you don't need to read
it.  But one stud wide is plenty wide enough to detect if you think you do.

Derek


Calum Tsang wrote:
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft wrote:
I like the 6x6 size.

I think the frame is unnecessary.  I only need to be aligned with the
board, my alignment with the other bot is irrelevant.  I can use the
alignment marks anyway I see fit.

I like the 6x6 cell as well.  But 1 wide thick lines or 2 wide?

I'm not sure the frame is required either, but the alignment marks certainly
are.

Calum





Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: TTT board marks or not
 
(...) The reason why I think we might want two is because of even versus odd spacing. I can't explain it, I just think an odd line space would make it more difficult. Calum (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: TTT board marks or not
 
(...) I like the 6x6 cell as well. But 1 wide thick lines or 2 wide? I'm not sure the frame is required either, but the alignment marks certainly are. Calum (18 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

44 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR