Subject:
|
Re: rtl22 working concept
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:21:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
821 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> On Sun, August 13, 2006 9:22 pm, Chris Magno wrote:
> > Calum, I think you missed my point. When I said "easier" to draw. I
> > meant to imply, that the robot who plays O would be at a SLIGHT timed
> > disadvantage, vs. the X playing bot.
> >
> > We need to finalize a "timed" game and or would each "round" consists of
> > 2 matches where each bot gets to play X and O?
>
> If only one game is played, the bot that plays first will be at a big disadvantage...
Steve's got a point--if the contestants make smart enuf 'bots that will always
end in a 'cat's game'--i.e. no one won, then who goes first also goes last--that
means that the bot that plays first will have one more move than the 'bot that
goes second--that'll add to the first player's time.
ANyway, throwing it out there. I'm liking the idea of drawn tic tac toe
Dave K
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: rtl22 working concept
|
| (...) So, we find a marker. we agree on 2 games (each bot is and X and an O) we agree that the game board is going to be a 8 1/2 x 11 sheet of paper, with a printed board from a PDF. the bot space is the L shape around the paper. you can have a bot (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
