To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 16626
16625  |  16627
Subject: 
Re: rtl22 working concept
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 01:38:44 GMT
Viewed: 
972 times
  
On Sun, August 13, 2006 9:22 pm, Chris Magno wrote:
Calum, I think you missed my point. When I said "easier" to draw. I
meant to imply, that the robot who plays O would be at a SLIGHT timed
disadvantage, vs. the X playing bot.

We need to finalize a "timed" game and or would each "round" consists of
2 matches where each bot gets to play X and O?

If only one game is played, the bot that plays first will be at a big disadvantage...



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: rtl22 working concept
 
(...) Steve's got a point--if the contestants make smart enuf 'bots that will always end in a 'cat's game'--i.e. no one won, then who goes first also goes last--that means that the bot that plays first will have one more move than the 'bot that goes (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: rtl22 working concept
 
(...) Calum, I think you missed my point. When I said "easier" to draw. I meant to imply, that the robot who plays O would be at a SLIGHT timed disadvantage, vs. the X playing bot. We need to finalize a "timed" game and or would each "round" (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

44 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR