Subject:
|
Re: rtl22 working concept
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 01:38:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1043 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sun, August 13, 2006 9:22 pm, Chris Magno wrote:
> Calum, I think you missed my point. When I said "easier" to draw. I
> meant to imply, that the robot who plays O would be at a SLIGHT timed
> disadvantage, vs. the X playing bot.
>
> We need to finalize a "timed" game and or would each "round" consists of
> 2 matches where each bot gets to play X and O?
If only one game is played, the bot that plays first will be at a big disadvantage...
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: rtl22 working concept
|
| (...) Steve's got a point--if the contestants make smart enuf 'bots that will always end in a 'cat's game'--i.e. no one won, then who goes first also goes last--that means that the bot that plays first will have one more move than the 'bot that goes (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: rtl22 working concept
|
| (...) Calum, I think you missed my point. When I said "easier" to draw. I meant to imply, that the robot who plays O would be at a SLIGHT timed disadvantage, vs. the X playing bot. We need to finalize a "timed" game and or would each "round" (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
