To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 2191
2190  |  2192
Subject: 
Re: Uber-Galic question
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun
Date: 
Wed, 14 Jul 1999 03:18:04 GMT
Viewed: 
735 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Ed Jones writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:

Isn't "bad" discribing G&S redundant - talk about mindless drek.  P'toooe
Sorry,  can't deal with the whiny tenors, the littelboy voiced sopranos, the
buxom gravel voiced mezzos and the thin voiced frogs fillin in the bottom.

I'd much rather see Sondheim anyday.

My brother was in a good _Man of
La Mancha_, but it's one of the silliest scripts I've ever seen...

Terrible script- some good tunes.

BTW - Brian Denehhey (sp?) is absoltuley incredible in the current run of • Death
of a Salesman.

He doesn't play the doctor does he? ;-)

Well, I can't argue with fine upbringing and refined tastes, so I'll refrain
from saying something was "good", and just state that "I was entertained" (or
not) which reflects more on myself that anything else but is nonetheless
accurate and not debatable.

-Tom McD.
when replying, please be courteous to your readers and clean up any spamcake
messes.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Uber-Galic question
 
(...) Isn't "bad" discribing G&S redundant - talk about mindless drek. P'toooe Sorry, can't deal with the whiny tenors, the littelboy voiced sopranos, the buxom gravel voiced mezzos and the thin voiced frogs fillin in the bottom. I'd much rather see (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)

71 Messages in This Thread:






























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR