Subject:
|
Re: Taxes from Lego auctions?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 25 Dec 1999 05:31:51 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIENIAZEK@NOVERA.ihatespamCOM
|
Viewed:
|
695 times
|
| |
|
|
Jasper Janssen wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 15:19:33 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm gonna go with "none"
>
> I'll give you three to one odds and go for "dramtically negative",
> myself.
No bet. I keep thinking (at 2 am or so) that none==no OR negative. I
should have just said negative too.
> You can define pi as whatever you want, and it's not even that stupid
> - but the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter won't
> change.
I was insufficiently precise and what you said is what I meant to say,
basically.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Taxes from Lego auctions?
|
| (...) That's what I figured, but hey, what's life without a little smart-arse remark now and then. (...) It happens. You know what (don't tell anybody else I said this, mind!): It's happened to me too. More than once. Imagine that... Jasper (25 years ago, 25-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Taxes from Lego auctions?
|
| (...) I'll give you three to one odds and go for "dramtically negative", myself. (...) Interestingly, I've heard one rumour that this is _exactly_ what they're doing. I suppose the system of investing in companies in exchange for shares in it (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
56 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
