Subject:
|
Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:09:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1013 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> >
> > > And Bush? Well, there isn't much doubt that he couldn't even be bothered to
> > > fulfill his obligations while dodging the war Kerry was fighting in, regardless
> > > of the authenticity of the message in question.
> >
> > I like what the officer's secretary said (paraphrasing)... "those memos are
> > obviously fake, because I didn't type them, and men just didn't do secretaries
> > work back then... but the ideas they express are obviously true"
>
> I should have read the paper this morning - the secretray thing was on the fold
> and I tossed the paper in the car without reading it. Interesting. She doesn't
> confirm the memos as real, but confirms Bush's commanding officer's opinions
> contained in them.
>
> >
> > But again, does this matter? Does it matter what Kerry did back then either?
>
> Ask the ghosts of those who were drafted and died in Viet Nam. I'd sure want
> the guy who actually fought than the slacker who pulled strings to get out,
> didn't even fulfill his duty, and wants everyone to ignore that for the sake of
> politics and ideology.
>
> >
> > Maybe a little, but what really matters is what Bush has done to the country and
> > the world, and is likely to do going forward, and what really matters is what
> > Kerry would be likely to do going forward.
>
> Maybe if the voters had considered Bush's history past history more closely they
> might not have to be considering his record in office. :-)
>
> -->Bruce<--
In this case, repetition obviously doesn't teach the donkey--
Looking back at the companies that Dubya the Idiot was in charge of, looking at
his record in the forces, and his personal life, a la cocaine and alcohol, and
yet he still became president, and lo and behold, he still flagrantly disregards
policies, laws and people and does whatever he wants with no consideration of
the consequences or compassion for those that have to pay for his inept actions.
His record in office is identical to his past performances anywhere else. Yet
he's ahead in the polls. So obviously it matters not about his past
performance, his current performance, the American people aren't paying
attention to any of that.
So what exactly are the Americans paying attention to?
Just wondering...
Dave K
|
|
Message has 3 Replies: | | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
|
| (...) Jeez, you Canadians don't know anything. Americans like Bush because "he keeps us safe," "he's a likeable guy," and "he has strong morals and values." All right, the real reasons are these: he has terrified most Americans into believing that (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
|
| (...) Ideaology. People don't want to believe that their candidate can do any wrong because the alternative is electing a guy that they disagree with. So, they stick their head in the sand, and pretend like these things aren't fundamental flaws that (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
|
| (...) I should have read the paper this morning - the secretray thing was on the fold and I tossed the paper in the car without reading it. Interesting. She doesn't confirm the memos as real, but confirms Bush's commanding officer's opinions (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|