Subject:
|
Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:07:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
738 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/ presents some of the awfully convincing case
> for them being done in Microsoft Word, not on an IBM Selectric.
Unfortunately I did not realise that link changes day by day. It's changed this
afternoon to a new article.
The article I was referring to was this one:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110005615
Apologies for any confusion.
Note that midway through the article it has a very nice animated gif:
http://opinionjournal.com/best/cya.gif
which shows that at least one of these COULD have been produced with MSWord...
note that "COULD have" does not equal "was proven to have been"...
As I said/alluded in my original post, I suspect these were forged but really
don't think that's the point. I won't cry if this takes CBS down though.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
|
| (...) That's worth remembering. I can produce a real-looking pre-1985 dollar bill in Photoshop, but that hardly proves that the next 1984 dollar bill you receive came off of my desktop. After all, the Shroud of Turin can be reproduced with relative (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Microsoft and IBM in secret plot?
|
| Well that's a crazy headline isn't it... but no crazier than some in the regular media I'm surprised to see no mention yet here of "rathergate" as it is being called in the blogosphere. Were the memos about Bush's service that CBS 60 minutes ran a (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
