To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21839
21838  |  21840
Subject: 
Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:26:14 GMT
Viewed: 
288 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Carl Nelson wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
Everyone who buys anything (excepting a few items like food and, in some
cases, clothing) already pays taxes, so this particular fallacy as you
frame it does not exist in the governor's reasoning.

They share part of the tax burden.  But if they don't share the full tax
burden, aren't they just, as you put it in another reply to me, squatters?

  No moreso than if they pay the $10 per annum tax that you proposed.  And I
would suggest the person in my example is less of a squatter, since yearly sales
tax (plus hidden taxes like tariffs, etc.) would almost certainly exceed $10.

  Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind!
 
(...) Then it's a matter of degrees--the more you pay in taxes the less you are a squatter? Dave K (21 years ago, 13-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind!
 
(...) They share part of the tax burden. But if they don't share the full tax burden, aren't they just, as you put it in another reply to me, squatters? Best regards, Carl (21 years ago, 13-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

47 Messages in This Thread:













Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR