To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21837
21836  |  21838
Subject: 
Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:13:35 GMT
Viewed: 
251 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
  Everyone who buys anything (excepting a few items like food and, in some
cases, clothing) already pays taxes, so this particular fallacy as you frame it
does not exist in the governor's reasoning.

They share part of the tax burden.  But if they don't share the full tax burden,
aren't they just, as you put it in another reply to me, squatters?

Best regards,
Carl



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind!
 
(...) No moreso than if they pay the $10 per annum tax that you proposed. And I would suggest the person in my example is less of a squatter, since yearly sales tax (plus hidden taxes like tariffs, etc.) would almost certainly exceed $10. Dave! (21 years ago, 13-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Finally some church/state mingling that I can really get behind!
 
(...) Everyone who buys anything (excepting a few items like food and, in some cases, clothing) already pays taxes, so this particular fallacy as you frame it does not exist in the governor's reasoning. Dave! (21 years ago, 13-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

47 Messages in This Thread:













Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR