Debate : 17923


Off-Topic / Debate / 17923	17922 \| 17924

Subject:	Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:36:32 GMT
Viewed:	550 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes: > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: > > > > "I don't agree with a unilateral attack of Iraq." > > > > You did not "specifically" say you don't agree with Bush's unilateral outlook. > > What exactly are you looking for, certain verbiage? Come off it. > > Chris Just ignore him. We both now he'll never concede anything. The guy has no shame. Bruce

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
(...) A dodge? You mean you don't want to explain your bunker-buster comment, tell us what the USA's official response to SH gassing his own people was, why you want to view Iraq in isolation or even what is “all Britain's fault”? Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
(...) What exactly are you looking for, certain verbiage? Come off it. Chris (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

61 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search