Subject:
|
Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:34:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
440 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > > > Afghan civilians were
> > > > sacrificed to protect ground troops. The unwillingness to put troops in • danger
> > > > meant (probably) that OBL and MO were able to escape.
> > >
> > > Afghan civilians were "sacrificed"? What in the world are you babbling • about?
> >
> > High altitude bombing was used instead lower altitude bombing or ground • troops.
> > This saved the lives of servicemen, but was not as accurate. Afghan civilians
> > were sacrificed to protect ground troops and pilots. OK?
>
> I wanted to insert a comment. I'm agreeing with Bruce by and large in this
> thread (because he doesn't _at all_ seem to be defending the US' naughtiness)
> but on this one point, I knew exactly what Scott meant, and I agree with him.
> We did choose a course of action that was protective of our military apparatus
> with added risk to civilians on the ground.
I suppose it is obvious to everyone except Scott, but I'm not defending U.S.
actions to any particular degree, I'm just objecting to Scott's axe-grinding
and one-sided presentations. And I'm a liberal! I hate Bush. I don't like
Israel's actions. I don't agree with a unilateral attack of Iraq. Bush is
feeding the world a line of bull. War isn't the answer to everything.
Scott is losing what should be a prime demographic. :-)
As to bombing from high altitude, that has never been particularly accurate.
To use it is almost always a compromise. I just object to Scott's depiction
of it.
>
> But I think that in doing so, we made the right choice, which seems to be
> opposite of Scott's stance. War is hell.
Absolutely. And the Brits beat Sherman to that by half a millenia with
their chavauchees. :-)
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
