To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17910
17909  |  17911
Subject: 
Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:28:50 GMT
Viewed: 
657 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:

I specifically said I don't agree with Bush's unilateral outlook.

That's not my perception.

That's because you don't want to admit that there is anything wrong about
your debating techniques, which is the real thing I'm objecting to.  The
subject is just the medium.  This is now the third time I've pointed this
out (all three contained in this post), and will undoubtedly be the third
time you ignore it.  So at this point, I must move.  Constantly catching you
out is just too easy, and I think everyone has gotten the point long before
I made it.  You will become the second person who's posts I'll simply ignore.


I meant, its not my perception that you "don't agree with Bush's unilateral
outlook". BTW: Where did you "specifically" say you don't?

Four messages back along this exact string.

"I suppose it is obvious to everyone except Scott, but I'm not defending U.S.
actions to any particular degree, I'm just objecting to Scott's axe-grinding
and one-sided presentations.  And I'm a liberal!  I hate Bush.  I don't like
Israel's actions.  I don't agree with a unilateral attack of Iraq.  Bush is
feeding the world a line of bull.  War isn't the answer to everything."



Scott A


Scott A

I'm
critical of your axe-grinding, slanted presentations, and sanctimonious
self-righteousness, but not always with your actual positions.

Bruce



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
 
(...) That's not how I view it. (...) You did not "specifically" say you don't agree with Bush's unilateral outlook. Scott A (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
 
(...) I meant, its not my perception that you "don't agree with Bush's unilateral outlook". BTW: Where did you "specifically" say you don't? Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 29-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

61 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR