Subject:
|
Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 07:34:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
503 times
|
| |
|
|
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
>
> > > > I specifically said I don't agree with Bush's unilateral outlook.
> > >
> > > That's not my perception.
>
> That's because you don't want to admit that there is anything wrong about
> your debating techniques, which is the real thing I'm objecting to.
That's not how I view it.
> The
> subject is just the medium. This is now the third time I've pointed this
> out (all three contained in this post), and will undoubtedly be the third
> time you ignore it. So at this point, I must move. Constantly catching you
> out is just too easy, and I think everyone has gotten the point long before
> I made it. You will become the second person who's posts I'll simply ignore.
>
> >
> > I meant, its not my perception that you "don't agree with Bush's unilateral
> > outlook". BTW: Where did you "specifically" say you don't?
>
> Four messages back along this exact string.
>
> "I suppose it is obvious to everyone except Scott, but I'm not defending U.S.
> actions to any particular degree, I'm just objecting to Scott's axe-grinding
> and one-sided presentations. And I'm a liberal! I hate Bush. I don't like
> Israel's actions. I don't agree with a unilateral attack of Iraq. Bush is
> feeding the world a line of bull. War isn't the answer to everything."
You did not "specifically" say you don't agree with Bush's unilateral outlook.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
