Debate : 17920


Off-Topic / Debate / 17920	17919 \| 17921

Subject:	Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:12:09 GMT
Viewed:	608 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: > > "I don't agree with a unilateral attack of Iraq." > > You did not "specifically" say you don't agree with Bush's unilateral outlook. What exactly are you looking for, certain verbiage? Come off it. Chris

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
(...) Not quite, but that would nice. :) The quote above only tells us that Bruce is against a "unilateral attack on Iraq", not that Bruce does not share Bushes selfish unilateral outlook as far as the wider world is concerned. The difference is (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
(...) Just ignore him. We both now he'll never concede anything. The guy has no shame. Bruce (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: world mandate (Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace))
(...) That's not how I view it. (...) You did not "specifically" say you don't agree with Bush's unilateral outlook. Scott A (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

61 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search