To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17663
17662  |  17664
Subject: 
Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:29:47 GMT
Viewed: 
323 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
Either way I am baffled to no end at how anyone can
think liberating a people living under a dictatorship is a bad idea.

Why start with Iraq?

If one has to start somewhere, Iraq is a pretty good place to start. Of
course, one has to question Dubya's reasons (and complete lack of backing up
his rhetoric with any thing like facts) for starting in the first place.

Why try to overthrow democracy in Central America?

It's good for business.

Why
support Musharraf in Pakistan?

It's convenient.

Why fund human rights abuses in Israel?

Perception.

Why
make excuses for the Saudi's?

Oil.

Why back “democracy” in Kuwait?

Now you are just being contradictory.  Make up your mind whether you are
going to criticize the United States for for opposing democracy or
supporting it.


Why make a
sponsor of international terror a key ally in the “war on terror”(TM)?

Terrorists that don't oppose us are not terrorists, to us.  It's continuing
the policy of Bush, Sr. to work with the devil you know (such as he did
with, oh dear, Sadddam).

Why
back & fund the warlords in Afghanistan?

Because the alternative was worse?

Why start with Iraq?

Are you insinuating that there is a better target?


What Bush Jr is doing is nothing to do with "liberating a people living
under a dictatorship" and everything to do with American self-interest.

You act surprised, as if nations routinely do things not in their self-interest.


Why start with Iraq?

Oil.  Oily to bed, and Oily to rise, makes a Texan* healthy, wealthy and
filthy rich.

*Or a couple of them, in any case

Not all answers given above are serious.  Or totally serious.  Or my own
viewpoint.  :-)

Bruce



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)
 
(...) Fact. (...) Does Kuwait really have democracy? (...) This is utter hypocrisy. (...) Worse for Afghans or the USA? (...) There may well be. Why not tighten the screws on Musharraf, the Saudi’s or Sharron? These guys rely on support from the USA (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)
 
(...) Why start with Iraq? Why try to overthrow democracy in Central America? Why support Musharraf in Pakistan? Why fund human rights abuses in Israel? Why make excuses for the Saudi's? Why back “democracy” in Kuwait? Why make a sponsor of (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

61 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR