Subject:
|
Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 21 Sep 2002 14:57:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
278 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > Either way I am baffled to no end at how anyone can
> > think liberating a people living under a dictatorship is a bad idea.
>
> Why start with Iraq? Why try to overthrow democracy in Central America? Why
> support Musharraf in Pakistan? Why fund human rights abuses in Israel? Why
> make excuses for the Saudi's? Why back democracy in Kuwait? Why make a
> sponsor of international terror a key ally in the war on terror(TM)? Why
> back & fund the warlords in Afghanistan? Why start with Iraq?
>
> What Bush Jr is doing is nothing to do with "liberating a people living
> under a dictatorship" and everything to do with American self-interest.
Which is what I wrote. I also said the United Nations should be doing it.
>
> Why start with Iraq?
>
> Scott A
Its as good as anyplace to start. I also said EVERY dictatorship should be
eradicated. Did you even read the post?
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|