Subject:
|
Re: Why start with Iraq? - (Re: Iraq, Dictators, and Peace)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:23:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1621 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > Either way I am baffled to no end at how anyone can
> > > think liberating a people living under a dictatorship is a bad idea.
> >
> > Why start with Iraq? Why try to overthrow democracy in Central America? Why
> > support Musharraf in Pakistan? Why fund human rights abuses in Israel? Why
> > make excuses for the Saudi's? Why back “democracy” in Kuwait? Why make a
> > sponsor of international terror a key ally in the “war on terror”(TM)? Why
> > back & fund the warlords in Afghanistan? Why start with Iraq?
> >
> > What Bush Jr is doing is nothing to do with "liberating a people living
> > under a dictatorship" and everything to do with American self-interest.
>
> Which is what I wrote. I also said the United Nations should be doing it.
> >
> > Why start with Iraq?
> >
> > Scott A
>
> Its as good as anyplace to start.
I don't agree. Why not clean up your own neighbourhood first?
Scott A
> I also said EVERY dictatorship should be
> eradicated. Did you even read the post?
>
> -Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
