Subject:
|
Re: Mladen Pejic... Cool down.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 7 Jun 2001 22:36:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
878 times
|
| |
|
|
Whoops! Guess I should have finished that last post BEFORE posting it
(that's how it's SUPPOSED to work, isn't it?)!
Larry's the more corrrect in this instance. E-mail confidentiality is mostly
a politeness issue. Assume that "anything you say can and will be used
aginst you", just to CYA.
I included the employer/employee stuff 'cause it interests me (and has a
little in common here).So there.
Matt (Fast becoming the 'Self-Proclaimed LUGNET King of Citing Stuff ©')
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Mladen Pejic... Cool down.
|
| Thank you for posting those links, I was getting curious enough to look it up and I probably would have been browsing law for hours. Now I'll go whip together that Arachnomechatronitroid. (23 years ago, 7-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Mladen Pejic... Cool down.
|
| (...) Will I do? Here are a couple: From: (URL) recipient of e-mail is generally free to share the information in the e-mail with anyone..." "Unless the recipient has some duty of confidentiality (e.g., physician-patient, attorney-client, trade (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
