Subject:
|
Re: Names of things.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:37:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1846 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.loc.au, Richie Dulin writes:
> > In lugnet.loc.au, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> > > I'm disputing the assertion that BSB is the "wrong" name but Dark Shark is
> > > the "right" name which was made upthread. I see no prima facie basis for
> > > that assertion, and was asking for some support for it from the person who
> > > made it, or anyone else either for that matter.
> >
> > Any 6285 distributed by LEGO Australia would be correctly called a 'Dark
> > Shark'. It would therefore be the original name *in Australia*.
>
> OK, now you're making the assertion too, and just as unsupportedly. Granted
> that LEGO originally released this set with multiple names in english
> speaking countries... they apparently have now decided to use just one. What
> makes your statement "correctly called a 'Dark Shark'" true?
I'm with Larry on this. While that Santa Fe Super Chief is based on a real
world object, Lego are just tagging Lego creations with a hopefully marketable
identifier.
The 6285 I possess is a USA edition and has the name Black Seas Barracuda on
the box. Did Australian (European) sets actually have a name on them ?
> LEGO can call things what they want, when they want, and whatever they *say*
> is correct *is* correct, aussie whinging about it notwithstanding. It's
> their product after all. Who are you (or I) to say what's correct and what
> isn't?
Maybe all Lugnetters should learn Danish and only converse in Danish while
on Lugnet (;^)
Using the original Danish names (if that's the starting point).
> By making this assertion, you're supporting Ben's
> anti-everyone-except-australia ranting. Which is too bad, really, as it's a
> wasted effort on his part.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Names of things.
|
| "pete white" <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:H3tExp.LLu@lugnet.com... (...) *say* (...) what (...) Well, that would be more appropriate than everyone having to learn (and converse in) American.... after all, it's a Danish product. (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Names of things.
|
| (...) OK, now you're making the assertion too, and just as unsupportedly. Granted that LEGO originally released this set with multiple names in english speaking countries... they apparently have now decided to use just one. What makes your statement (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
