Subject:
|
Re: Names of things.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:12:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1815 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Paul Baulch writes:
> Well, that would be more appropriate than everyone having to learn (and
> converse in) American.... after all, it's a Danish product.
No, it's a universal product made by a Danish multinational which, for the
most part, uses English as their internal working language. (not American,
mind you, but English... your prejudice is showing through)
Most multinationals these days use English as their internal working language.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Names of things.
|
| (...) I would have to debate that one...most of the "English" used is American as shown by their mis-spelling of several words [colour being a prime example.] Benjamin Whytcross (22 years ago, 12-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Names of things.
|
| "pete white" <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:H3tExp.LLu@lugnet.com... (...) *say* (...) what (...) Well, that would be more appropriate than everyone having to learn (and converse in) American.... after all, it's a Danish product. (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
