Subject:
|
Re: Names of things.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 Oct 2002 22:56:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1805 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Benjamin Whytcross writes:
> In lugnet.loc.au, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> > 1 - and I hope they never do it ever again, as it's a big waste of effort
> > and money, as it requires wasteful packaging designs, prevents easy resale
> > in different countries, causes relatively pointless discussions, etc. etc.
>
> WELL...It's only the US/Canada/Mexico markets that would have this
> problem...except for left-overs that sometimes wash up over here, all sets
> sold in Australia have no set name [excluding Star wars, harry potter [from
> memory] and alpha team underwater sets [also from memory]] and none have
> piece count...and I think this is standard everywhere EXCEPT for the
> US/Canada/Mexico markets, so really the only extra expence is to add these
> for these specific markets...at least that's how it appears to me :)
Excluding catalogs of course, which *do* have set names, and would thus
require extra expense in (at least) Aus as well...
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Names of things.
|
| (...) And note that I almost entirely post in .loc.au and that this was the forum used, and the message was intended for an Aussie audience. After all, I COULD have posted in .general if I was arguing with the rest of the world. [As a side note, do (...) (22 years ago, 12-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
