Subject:
|
Re: Names of things.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:41:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1908 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.loc.au, Paul Baulch writes:
>
> > Well, that would be more appropriate than everyone having to learn (and
> > converse in) American.... after all, it's a Danish product.
>
> No, it's a universal product made by a Danish multinational which, for the
> most part, uses English as their internal working language. (not American,
> mind you, but English... your prejudice is showing through)
>
> Most multinationals these days use English as their internal working language.
I would have to debate that one...most of the "English" used is American as
shown by their mis-spelling of several words [colour being a prime example.]
Benjamin Whytcross
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Names of things.
|
| (...) No, it's a universal product made by a Danish multinational which, for the most part, uses English as their internal working language. (not American, mind you, but English... your prejudice is showing through) Most multinationals these days (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
