Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 21:55:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
463 times
|
| |
|
|
I'd like to add a new topic to this discussion and to add my comments.
I've started work on a train layout design for our club so I'm constantly
updating photos in my layout folder. Now everytime I upload a photo, the
folder becomes private and no one can access my designs. This is really
***** me off.
I appreciate the moderating of files to see if it is appropriate, but the
lag time is really annoying. Here's a thought, what if you didn't moderate
all of the files being uploaded. Instead add a review button that a viewer
could push if he thought the image he was look at was inappropriate. When
the viewer pushes the button the picture is then made non-public until or
unless it has been reviewed.
In lugnet.general, Jeremy Scott writes:
> A discussion between my and a moderator about a questionable pic...
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kevin Loch wrote:
> > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=227890
> > I moderated it ok. What's wrong with it?
>
> My Uncle wasn't happy when we >came across that picture.
> He saw it as a sex picture rather than a picture regarding Legos.
I can see how your uncle might think that photo could be sexual, but I don't
think that was the idea. There is no nudity and no 'bumps' sticking though
the shirt front. If the shirt was on a man there wouldn't be a problem.
Besides I've seen more sexual pictures in the newspaper. How many bra sales
are there in a Month? I say tell your uncle he's got a dirty mind.
> > What happened? Someone with admins-rights at Brickshelf deleted the
> > 'me-picture' of Juergen. Is a picture of a Lego-Fan really too off-topic to >>be published in the main folder of a personnal brickshelf gallery?
I have a feeling that the 'me' photo was deleted accidentally and that if it
was published again it would probably stay. We need to remember that
Brickshelf had to clean house a few weeks ago and when your going through so
many folders and pictures it is very easy to accidentally delete something.
Jonathan
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
| (...) One suggestion would be to make a new folder each time. That way when you put up new content, the old folders will still be accessible. You could have a main folder named "Layout" and then subfolders named "Update August 10, 2002", "Update (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
| (...) Not necessarily, so relax. All you need to do is deep link to the actual .jpg (or whatever), and people will be able to see it instantly. And keep repeating to yourself, "Brickshelf is a free service, and I'm *lucky* to have it". Leg Godt, (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
| A discussion between my and a moderator about a questionable pic... (...) Do we forget KIDS like Lego toys too? I was sharing my adult version of this hobby with my young cousin, while being overlooked by my uncle. I was showing off the recent (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
