Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:52:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
530 times
|
| |
|
|
In the post to which I am responding, I am unable to follow who is asserting
what point. But in any case, what's wrong with any of the pictures -- whether
shirts, model guns, or in-game explosions? I hope that it is _not_ Kevin's
goal to make the content pleasing to every loony bird out there. The only way
to do that would be to close it down.
If some guy's picture was removed, that's probably because it was entirely
unclear how this had to do with LEGO. If it _did_ have something to do with
LEGO, maybe it should have been explained (in the image, or in a text file).
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
| (...) whether (...) way (...) Hi Chris If a picture of an AFOL is named 'me', it is quite self-explaining, it shows an AFOL. And an AFOL is (at least in my eyes) Lego-related and on-topic. Juergen may not look like Claudia Schiffer, but he was not (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
| A discussion between my and a moderator about a questionable pic... (...) Do we forget KIDS like Lego toys too? I was sharing my adult version of this hobby with my young cousin, while being overlooked by my uncle. I was showing off the recent (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
