Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Sep 2002 02:16:51 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1066 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, John Neal writes:
> Um, *not* a picture of a woman, but a picture of a woman's *chest*. Think to
> yourself: Would Kevin have censored it if the woman's head were included in the
> picture? Would Kevin have censored it if the picture were focused entirely
> upon the LEGO logo itself? Would Kevin have censored it if it were simply the
> shirt lying on a bed? The answers should be "no". The reason is judgment, and
> the lack thereof when this pic was taken/cropped. This isn't rocket science
> here.
This is a REALLY funny thread. I can barely figure out what people are
arguing for or against any longer...
BTW, this image was not removed -- if it had been, we wouldn't all be able
to see it for ourselves and pass our own stupid judgments about it.
I am just guessing wildly here, but I am assuming it is a picture by Chris
Maddison of Shiri Dori wearing a Lego shirt. As far as I know, this is just
evidence of two adult enthusiasts that found love while playing with bricks.
Some of you people are so cynical about the wrong things. And this when
there are SO many things to be genuinely cynical about.
This is what you choose...?!
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
| (...) ??? Um, *not* a picture of a woman, but a picture of a woman's *chest*. Think to yourself: Would Kevin have censored it if the woman's head were included in the picture? Would Kevin have censored it if the picture were focused entirely upon (...) (23 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
