Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Sep 2002 03:08:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
765 times
|
| |
|
|
> Kevin Loch wrote:
> > Jeremy Scott wrote:
> > > I don't agree with this passing moderation. I don't know if it was you
> > > or who moderated this or someone else but please reconsider.
> > >
> > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=227890
> > >
> > > Jeremy Scott
> >
> > I moderated it ok. What's wrong with it?
Anyone that actually finds that picture offensive should have their head
examined. Just remember, you are all victims of your own imaginations.
-Mike Petrucelli
(Then again I am still trying to figure out what kind of whack job would find
J.D. Salinger's extremely boring "The Catcher in the Rye" pornographic. I mean
foul language sure, but pornographic? Oh yeah, and Harry Potter is all about
satanism too.)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
| (...) Actually, someone who finds that picture offensive may have nothing at all wrong with his or her head other than another point of view. For example, from a feminist perspective it could be argued that the image is offensive because it (...) (23 years ago, 4-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
| A discussion between my and a moderator about a questionable pic... (...) Do we forget KIDS like Lego toys too? I was sharing my adult version of this hobby with my young cousin, while being overlooked by my uncle. I was showing off the recent (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
