Subject:
|
Re: Juniorization Lives, and comments on marketing strategy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Feb 2001 06:34:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1333 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jake McKee writes:
> I couldn't agree more. This is actually *wild* speculation! Remember the
> idea....create a _full_ product line that spans an age range of 0-99. How
> can this happen if any line goes away that targets an age range?
But here's another thought: the age range for System appears (to me) to be
shrinking. What used to make a great gift for a 9- to 10-year-old now makes
sense targeted at 6- or 7-year-olds. If Creator fills up the 4-6 range, that
leaves a smaller audience for System. (Since Jr.-ized System appears to be
dead, this has essentially already happened.)
> If creator is successful, then another gap in the product line has been
> filled. Terrific success both for the creator line, as well as the entire
> range. Once you get a kid hooked on LEGO toys, they will very likely
> transistion from one line to another as they grow older. If there are gaps
> in the line, how can this happen.
What if Lego finds that the most logical step from Creator is to something like
Bionicle?
Don't mind me, I'm just rumor-mongering.
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
