 | | Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
I would like to take a step toward the New Castle World. I feel a committee should be assembled to decide where CW is going. Therefore, I have started this thread to form the Castle World Committee (CWC). The committee's purpose is not to (...) (21 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
-snip- (...) I agree with everything you've said. (...) I'd like to second everyone on that list except myself and nominate Ben Ellerman as well (if he wants). -lenny (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
(...) yeah, and nominate anthony, too. but i thought that'd be obvious.' -lenny (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
(...) I'll second Lenny, Ben Ellerman (nominated by Lenny), and you (Anthony). I think all three of you have contibuted tremendously to the community. ~Kevin Blocksidge (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
(...) I would definitely like to be a part of a new Castle World site. I think most of us agree that new community features could be incorporated into a website. This is what I am most interested in. I appreciate the story telling aspect castle (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
(...) Ok back in the day (6 months ago) I met the criteria and made a ton of post about me wanting to be an admin. now i dont meete it any more cause i had to stop cause of school. so i now meet 2 of the criteria (as soon i I finish my big castle (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
(...) I think the above system is fair and democratic. I let my name stand for nomination. I second the above names, plus Benjamin Ellerman. I also nominate Matt Hein, the co-curator of Lugnet.Castle, who is responsible for setting up at least 50% (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
(...) Well, I disagree with you here Ben. The CBG was formed as an alliance of people who are producing Custom Castle Sets such as my Peasant's Hut and Ben Ellerman's Woodcutter's Cottage (forgive me if I get the name wrong). Currently, Ben is (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
(...) I'm unsure on whether I would want to let my name stand for nomination, though. Considering if someone were to second my name, with the lack of time I have to follow community events, I feel I might be ineffective in that position. 1 However, (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
Matt, I think you are confusing something here. Ben M. mentioned that this committee should cover issues of the CBG. The CBG and CastleWorld are two seperate things. Castle Builders' Guild is an alliance of people interested in making and selling (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
All: We need to go a little more slowly on this stuff at the moment. There's some background issues that have come up and need to be resolved before moving forward. Whereas I thought the hosting issue was settled, I haven't been able to gain FTP (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
(...) I have an update on the part above. We have access to CW again. Many thanks, as always, to our gracious ozbricks hosts! Blame it on my poor record keeping and my glitchy firewall settings. Who knew?! -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Richard, I'm sorry. This is not going to be a nice post. I've done my best to vent this elsewhere but I will not hold it back any longer. How much more slowly do you wish to go Richard? Look at the Castle World website. The last update was (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
Sava: One of my primary rules for CW is that you do not have any rights to my time. My own laziness is an issue that is being addressed with the new proposal that Pawel and I are working on. Why Pawel? Because it was his baby to begin with. Why not (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I disagree deeply here. I've talked a bit with anthony, and have read his posts closely. I think he has been working extensively to keep as many people in the mix as possible. Both him and I have been very open about our ideas about CW and (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Oh, the official "last name" adressal? Oooh, were gettin SERIOS here... (...) Nobody should. And nobody should have rights over anyone elses time either. (...) He created it, yeah, and so on. But hes barely posted. Hes lurking. So we should (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Bwhahahahaahahah. Oh, that's funny. Tell you what. Talk to Me, Matt G (might be hard to get a hold of) or Christina H. about rights to time. No one may have rights to your time, but if take on a thing like this, you have responsibilites. If (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Ok time for me to get a say in this. For the two years I’ve been here I surely know you can’t push over the castle world admins, trust me I have tried. I have started up argument and pleaded for new admind (with me as 1). Of course even though (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I would whole-heartedly support the formation of a new website. I haven't understand the huge conflict over what was basically a name since the start. I say go for it, even if Castle World comes back by an act of God. ~Kevin Blocksidge (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I have stood back and watched grown men make fools of themselves long enough. Anthony - Wah. No one's stopping you from making a new/different/better system for storytelling and moc sharing. Go do it if you want to. Rich - You need to sh** or (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Hey I am olny 14. Lol. Just had to get that in. (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(Hopefully this is a constructive post ... let me know via e-mail if it doesn't move us any further to a solution) First of all, I'm happy we are having this discussion. This shows me that there is interest in the project, which has definitely been (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
Hello! (...) Hehe! I wonder if this battle for regency in Castle World itself was worth to be told in an epic story within Castle World. :-) Bye Jojo (URL) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
Hi all, Just a couple of cents from someone outside the conversation. It seems like there are various different groups here: 1. Admins of the old Castle World. Maybe this is dead, maybe this will come back. Who knows? 2. People who want to admin a (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
In lugnet.castle.org.cw, Pawel Nazarewicz wrote some stuff that I deleted. Um, excuse me, can I say something? I've been loosely following this discussion for a while, and I've seen some tense exchanges. I think Castle World is an excellent thing (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I proposed the square-grid map. Im the one trying to get a whole starship-thing going. Ive already got rules that are re-written- just not on the site. Your "administrating realms" sounds like a good idea. You travel out, and what you have (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
(...) I totally agree. Pawel and I were going to work on this more privately and hopefully impress others with a more fully realized version than what Pawel has presented so far. I intended to report back immediately to this newsgroup with what was (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I'm kind of a lurker here, but have been a lurker for over 3 years now. I've probably read every one of Daniel's posts, and what he lacks in spelling and grammar, he more than makes up in enthusiasm and desire to help and create something out (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I just want to see how it all ends. I hope in a firey massacre. e. (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
Wow! This is the most intense argument I’ve ever seen on lugnet. Not that there haven’t been other ones that I don’t know about. You see I’m a strictly .castle lurker. Now I know that the opinion of one lurker doesn’t count for much so I’m not going (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Actually, your imput seems very welcome. As an onlooker who has "loosely followed" much of the discussion, I've attempted to kee a passive voice on the whole affair, since frankly, the community is being divided enough already. Richard: you (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
Why not make a new Castle World. Castle World 2 or something like that? (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) The idea is to take Castle World to the next level. Instead of just a site for telling storys, why not have tips and tricks on: Castle layout Castle construction Etc. I forget who had the Guild idea (much credit to them) and i was thinking (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
***...*** DISCLAIMER: Let it be known that I have no personal opinion whatsoever as to the life or death or otherwise of Castle World. What follows is not meant to reflect specifically on any one person who has been contributing to the discussuion (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw) !
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) On that note: It was always my feeling that Castle World was doomed from the get-go. It was a great idea, but having static HTML pages that are editable by 1 or a small group of admins just won't live forever. Eventually, you'll have to cut (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: A spark of Life (was: CW is dead)
|
|
(...) I had several ideas the other night, just after I posted my previous message. Now, I don't want to get into the argument over CW -- heck, I can't even discern what the hubub is about. I just want to see a fun, relaxed community having some (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: A spark of Life (was: CW is dead)
|
|
(...) I recall an idea similar to that one surfacing with the earlier CQ/ DraKen discussions a few months back. The idea I recall, though, deals with reports of the actual encounter between both sides and the strategies used to reach the resolution. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: A spark of Life (was: CW is dead)
|
|
I (...) Trying trying! (...) Grid map would not be used for big lands, but for movement. Say, in a single turn, a person could do just so much stuff and move just so far. (...) I dont like the report thing. One side says that they win, and the other (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
What’s wrong with those of you who think you’re entitled to Castle World TM. _It doesn't belong to you!!! It was created by a group of old-skool Lugnetters, and it’s their baby. If you don’t like it…too bad. Create your own Castle World type (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
_It doesn't belong to you!!! (...) They said if someone else was interested in it, they could take control of it. When someone tried, they refused. (...) Oooh, what if we went back on something? (...) Just leave, right, then? Go make a new board. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Castle World TM? Since when? I don't recall 'Castle World' being claimed as a trademark on LUGNET before. It is not claimed as a trademark on the website. It is a term now in common use to denote a sort of castle community thing. It is (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I think this stems from the fact that there was discussion about allowing the evolution of Castleworld, but different people with different ideas about what should be done next, with their own individual pre-concieved ideas. You are right that (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
At one point the professional artwork was created and owned by Craig Hamilton. I believe between the ‘group’ of them, they owned the artwork and existing sketches of TIOM’s intended map, and other aspects of their creations. Registered Trade Mark or (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I don’t really care what you do. But it just might be easier to create your own if they won’t let you in. (...) And thus, “so make your own [website].” (...) !A community created by them... That gives them precedence, and control. (...) I (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) No, it's not. I think you have some confusion between trademarks and copyright. The term "castle world" would not be covered by copyright. It has never been claimed (let alone registered) as a trademark until today, when you've tried to use it (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Its a community! How can we be a community when there are cheifs that make everyone else wait on them? You cannot run a community by going by your leisure! (...) We had wanted to try to re-format what groundwork was already layed. Ihop said (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: The Thread is Dead
|
|
Richard, Alex and all: I think you all have valid viewpoints of these issues. I do not think that arguing will benefit lugnet at all. People have made up their minds on what they will do. Arguing back and forth does not change this, it only clutters (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
Hello! (...) Of course the 'Castle World community' must not be confused with the 'LEGO Castle community'. There *may* be people out there who build castles, churches, medieval towns, chariots and battle machines or even just collect LEGO Castle (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle) !
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) This is one of the most sensible posts of this entire thread, IMO. I'm not a Castle-head, but I've been following the discussion here -- half entertained, half annoyed by the level of whining I'm reading. In my view, Jojo's point makes so much (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
All you guys want to do with CW is turn it into a game forum, and CW was NEVER about gaming. That's what I don't understand. CW was NEVER about gaming. Never! I also personally find it annoying that no one has responded directly to Pawel's post (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) We arnt TRYING to turn it gaming! Long ago, i had wanted to. No, we want to take the community to the next level, instead of keeping it just a little story-board basically. Why not have tips-n-tricks? Helpful articles? On-Line displays? Role (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Why not do it on your own? You and the others have already attacked Richard and Pawel enough to illicit this kind of reply. Were I Richard, I'd feel the same way. Instead of unifying the community, you (and some others) are the ones dividing (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
Not finished with my Ancients Theme project, it'll take a while. I've even created a 2025 Theme into my whole collection, but even that isn't finished either. (URL) have more Ancients Theme soldiers though, its not just the Medes Persian ones as I (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
