Subject:
|
Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle.org.cw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Sep 2003 13:53:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4621 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
I’d like to add a suggestion. The CWC should have some oversight for the
Castle-Builders’ Guild. It might mean taking control of too many things
or start to take on too much responsibility, but at least make sure we
have some good momentum on that as well, especially if Alex and Lenny are
part of the CWC team.
|
Well, I disagree with you here Ben.
The CBG was formed as an alliance of people who are producing Custom Castle Sets
- such as my Peasant’s Hut and Ben Ellerman’s Woodcutter’s Cottage (forgive me
if I get the name wrong). Currently, Ben is developing new custom sets (he’s
posted about them), and I have a few ideas rolling around in my head.
The website would be an added resource for the community, but membership in the
Guild is restricted to those engaged in Custom Castle Sets (at least, as I see
it). And, in all fairness, the ‘added resources’ would serve to draw people to
our custom sets so that they might like what they see and buy them.
Ben and I have been slow since first announcing our new organization in getting
a website up, but with BF and the fallout and some of my person financial
situation. We are moving forward.
-Lenny
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
| (...) I think the above system is fair and democratic. I let my name stand for nomination. I second the above names, plus Benjamin Ellerman. I also nominate Matt Hein, the co-curator of Lugnet.Castle, who is responsible for setting up at least 50% (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
53 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
