Subject:
|
Re: Castle World is dead.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle.org.cw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:44:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5696 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle.org.cw, Richard Marchetti wrote:
Oh, the official “last name” adressal? Oooh, were gettin SERIOS here...
| |
One of my primary rules for CW is that you do not have any rights to my time.
|
Nobody should. And nobody should have rights over anyone elses time either.
| |
My own laziness is an issue that is being addressed with the new proposal
that Pawel and I are working on. Why Pawel? Because it was his baby to
begin with.
|
He created it, yeah, and so on. But hes barely posted. Hes lurking. So we should
put a figure that barely posts as our head?
Why not you, Sava? Well, as seen from the previous post you can
| |
be a little dictatorial and I don’t care for that quality in a person.
|
Yet some how it seems to both me and i beleive Sava that you are being
dictatorial. Oh yes, i know, lotta people think i am too. But still, you do seem
to be a bit.
Pawel
| |
and I have worked out a solution that allows expansive autonomy for
individuals, groups, whomever wants to participate. The only reason I am
going to maintain a hand in it at all is to make sure no one person or group
messes up what others are doing.
|
Others: yourself, i guess? So your the cheif head, and others can participate,
but under your rule?
| |
Pawel and I have taken the babble of ideas from the bazaar back to the
cathedral with us, there we have refined those same ideas for re-release back
to the bazaar.
|
Oh, so your the big people in the Cathedral, and were the mindless rabble
babbling ideas at you. So you take what us, your equals say, twist it to your
ends, and then put it back? Interesting.
| |
I am sorry that you see this as an “us v them” thing, and that you intend on
taking everyone here with you.
|
Oh, so your the god with the white power or something? The savior? And me and
Sava are bringing the whole thing to damnation or something?
That seems divisive to me and I hope that
| |
others disagree that there is an “us v them” situation here, there is only an
us and no them at all. Why you would act to divide the participants in this
newsgroup is a move beyond all reason in my estimation.
|
Well, what i see in this is that your trying to steer .Castle to a particular
end, and some of us dont agree with it, and so you acuse us as “deviders”. So
we should just smile and go along with you? Whats up with that?
| |
I am going to continue refining the proposal Pawel and I are working on for
release to this community. If members of this community choose not to
participate, then that is everyone’s loss.
|
Seems kind of snottyish to me. If you dont like it, well, dont like it, but all
the true beleivers will go with me, or something like that is what it seems like
your saying.
Dont think that me and Sava are the only people who feel this way!
| |
Minor Digression: The last time the site was updated was actually almost a
year ago -- 10-27-02, 8:44 PM. When I took it over, it was really and truly
dead. I have done nothing of importance with the site until but very
recently when interest was naturally regenerated in this community.
|
You didnt generate interest, now did you? You didnt try to revive it. How is
that helping?
I am
| |
still unsure of how to proceed with CW, not in itself, but because of some of
the other projects under discussion and because I do not want CW to compete
for energy with those other projects. I have said as much elswhere -- I want
to pull us together, not tear us apart. I have made public requests of the
other project coordinators to let us know what they had in the works so that
we wouldn’t be stepping on anyone else’s toes
|
How come i, the person working hard on CQ, was never contacted? You have left it
out interly, probably going to dub it “dead before life”. Well, CW had a life
once, and its dead. So why should anyone care about it?
(see:http://news.lugnet.com/castle/org/cw/?n=1770)
DEAD LINK!
| |
. I wanted to give full support
to ideas like CCC, even if that meant putting CW on a back burner. End
Digression.
|
Oooh, what a sacrifice for you.
| |
As it stands. I think Pawel and I will just put our revamped CW idea out
there and let the bazaar choose where they will put their energies.
|
Ah, but what, me and sava shouldnt?
| |
I don’t care what you do on your own, Sava.
|
I guess you dont care about my projects, either.
Create whatever project you
| |
wish. Take whomever you want with you.
|
Cant people go where they please? There is no discussion, when someone like you
comes along. Its your way or the high-way.
I am not the boss of you as you are
Exept when it comes to CW plans. Then your the boss.
I have no idea why calling for a little patience is so
| |
taxing to you, we are not on a schedule after all...at least, I am not.
|
I know, i put CQ on a shcedule and beat the crap out of it. But if i called for
a “little patience” i got yelled at. Oh, i forgot, im flogging the dead horse.
| |
If something seems amiss, you need to reread the first line of this post.
|
Sava:? How does that help anything?
Aramir, son of Deremir, weilder of Andor, Nightwing, sword of the Balance of
Night, Paladin king of Uldeseen.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| (...) Ok time for me to get a say in this. For the two years I’ve been here I surely know you can’t push over the castle world admins, trust me I have tried. I have started up argument and pleaded for new admind (with me as 1). Of course even though (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| Sava: One of my primary rules for CW is that you do not have any rights to my time. My own laziness is an issue that is being addressed with the new proposal that Pawel and I are working on. Why Pawel? Because it was his baby to begin with. Why not (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
53 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
