Subject:
|
Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle.org.cw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Sep 2003 04:26:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4372 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle.org.cw, Anthony Sava wrote:
| |
I would like to take a step toward the New Castle World. I feel a committee
should be assembled to decide where CW is going. Therefore, I have started
this thread to form the Castle World Committee (CWC). The committee’s
purpose is not to administrate Castle World, but to put forth a set path upon
which the new Castle World admin(s) will take the website into the future.
Here are a few questions I believe the CWC should address:
- What role/purpose should Castle World play in the Lugnet.Castle community?
- What content should be available to the community on the Castle World website?
- How should the new Castle World website be set up, and what designs should be considered and perhaps voted upon?
- How should the new Castle World be administrated? And then, who should be nominated to administrate the new Castle World?
I feel the Castle World Committee should be picked out of the Lugnet.Castle
Community. Castle World is a website for the greater whole, not for one
person, and so I believe the community is what should govern where it is
going. Therefore, here are some criteria to help explain why I have nominated
the individuals that I have:
|
Ok back in the day (6 months ago) I met the criteria and made a ton of post
about me wanting to be an admin. now i dont meete it any more cause i had to
stop cause of school. so i now meet 2 of the criteria (as soon i I finish my big
castle MOC) so i dont want to just come back and be an admin but i dont wanna
pass it up... the point is in 3 months would i be able to assume the role of an
admin if i meet the criteria. now I’m stuck.
| |
I believe CWC members should:
- Have participated in the Castle World discussion thus far • For almost 2 years Minus some Months cause of school
- Have been posting in Lugnet.Castle or its subsidiary groups in the last three months outside of the Castle World discussion in a minimum of three different threads
|
Huh
| |
- Have created at least one new MOC or LEGO related creation and posted it to • Its coming soon and I know you’ll love, plus I post a bunch in the past
Castle World is about the here and now. I realize that these criteria rule
out some of our most influencial heroes, but let us look at facts. If they
haven’t been here on a regular basis, how can they say they want an active
role in Castle World when they haven’t given US and active role? Of
course, none of this rules out participation in CW once it has been
re-formed.
|
Ok when I’m in I am in. I check every day for new threads. I had to stop cause
school killed me and I know school is starting again but well I am sure itb wont
over take my life.
| |
The members of the CWC aren’t necessarily good builders,
|
Eh I’m ok (wait till you see my new Moc :)
nor are they
| |
necessarily famous all over Lugnet,
|
I aint famouse.
nor have the necessarily been posting
Almost 2 years.
But as long as they have been active, they have the potential to be
Ok i know I just got back but you who know me know I post all the time and
usually add in my 2 cents.
| |
Using these criteria, I have decided to nominate the following individuals
into the CWC, in alphabetical order by last name:
- Leonard Hoffman • i second
- Benjamin Medinets • definatly second
- Alex Polimeni • second
- Nathan Wells • And I’m gonna second this one too.
- Anyone who fits criteria 2 and 3 who wishes to be inolved
Now to be democratic, to be a member of the committee, your nomination must
be recognized and seconded. If you match the criteria, and are nominated by
someone else, like the four people above, you merely need to be seconded by
someone other than yourself. Once you’re seconded, you’re finalized, and
you’re in.
So in order to be clear, someone needs to second each of the above four
nominees. Once one person, other then themselves, seconds their nominations,
they are in the CWC.
If you nominate yourself, your nomination must be recognized and seconded by
two different people other than yourself.
For example, I will nominate myself, Anthony Sava. In order for me to be a
member of the CWC, someone needs to recongize me as a candidate, and then
someone else must second that nomination.
In order to nominate yourself, recognize a nomination, or to second a
nomination, reply to this thread stating your opinions. Anyone in the
Lugnet.Castle community may recognize or second a nomination.
I propose a deadline of September 7, 2003 for all finalizations of
nominations. A week isn’t too short in my opinion. If you’re active in the
community, you’ll have checked Lugnet.Castle at least once in one week’s
time.
The members of the CWC who are finalized will then vote among themselves for
a Chairman of the CWC, who’s job will be to keep the momentum up, and who
create a time table for the CWC to work on, so that a final product will be
produced.
The conclusions of the CWC should then be made public to the Lugnet.Castle
community to be approved (or not) and implimented.
Do I hear a second on all counts?
--Anthony
|
Ok so I dont think I am worthy as of now but used to be and will be. So tell me
if anyone thinks I should nominate myself cause I always wanted to be one even
though i had stopped i can say there was no intrest loss and I am here to stay.
By the way I nominate.
Anthony and Christina for nominies.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
| I would like to take a step toward the New Castle World. I feel a committee should be assembled to decide where CW is going. Therefore, I have started this thread to form the Castle World Committee (CWC). The committee's purpose is not to (...) (21 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
53 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
