Subject:
|
Re: Castle World is dead.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle.org.cw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Sep 2003 18:16:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5506 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle.org.cw, Andrew Engstrom wrote:
> Also, even if it is a freeform style game, there needs to be some structure too.
> If the mechanics are too vague, some people might be "scared off" and never join
> the game.
>
> I love the ideas floating around here. Keep working on this, but don't delegate
> a comittee. People took initiative to call votes and re-votes, present new concepts,
> and create temporary websites. .
> Keep it open to the public, and you'll get a result that all can enjoy.
> I am beginning to discover the joy of castle, and I may want to join in the > fun
> of CW if and when it is opened to the public!
>
> Sorry for such a long post, but I hope I've contributed to this discussion.
> Please feel free to comment and criticize. Always keep presenting new ideas,
> but never try to destroy someone else's ideas.
Actually, your imput seems very welcome. As an onlooker who has "loosely
followed" much of the discussion, I've attempted to kee a passive voice on the
whole affair, since frankly, the community is being divided enough already.
Richard:
you stated that anthony was being rather dictational, but I have to find that
comment *very* ludicrious. First off, holding onto administration rights on a
site you have little time to manage really doesn't sound fair to other parties
actively involved with the idea process. So you want to preserve site history,
that's nice and all, however, where are the ideas going? I mean, come on, we
have about five or so people posting who have more than enough time to discuss
and get CW off the ground. Given so much energy, I'm certan a very
serious,dedicated and open committee could pull this off in a week or so.
And the adamancy towards movement seems to be stalling these efforts.
Would you please explain these following cntradictions.
You:
- stated that nobody has rights to your time, yet took the administraitve
position for CW. With am administrative position, it is imperative to addres the
concerns of other community members involved.
- volunteered to give the reins of the project to others, but strayed from that
point.
- asked that all communication and ideas should stay within castle, yet traded
private emails with Pawel et al, and neglected to share those ideas with us just
yet. What the?
I apologize, but these misleadings are making me quite cautious, If nothing new
happens in a week, I'll join in with Mr Savs's efforts.
Remember people, we need OPEN communication.
Ospry, over and out
{M.Aaron Hein}
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| In lugnet.castle.org.cw, Pawel Nazarewicz wrote some stuff that I deleted. Um, excuse me, can I say something? I've been loosely following this discussion for a while, and I've seen some tense exchanges. I think Castle World is an excellent thing (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
53 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
