Subject:
|
Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle.org.cw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Sep 2003 01:25:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4677 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi all,
Just a couple of cents from someone outside the conversation. It seems like
there are various different groups here:
1. Admins of the old Castle World. Maybe this is dead, maybe this will come
back. Who knows?
2. People who want to admin a new Castle World.
3. People involved in creating building standards for marketplace, town.
Mostly this applies to group showings such as Brickfest etc.
4. People involved in designing and selling custom sets.
5. People (including myself) who display MOCs and stories independantly of the
above either on their own sites or places like Brickshelf, MOCPages, etc.
It seems there is no reason to debate any of this. The web is a completely
democratic medium where an infinite number of sites can co-exist. If your site
is well designed and has good content (and is well advertised), it will find an
audience. Perhaps the new “Castle World” should have a different name to avoid
some sort of copyright infringement, but otherwise who cares if there are two?
All of these things can be linked here at .castle, and good sites build
eachother up rather than conflict. If the issue is some free server space on
ozbricks, well, there’s a lot of server space out there, some free, some for a
nominal fee. Brickshelf will host images for anyone, and so all you really need
is a small amount of space to host html. So, to all, and with great respect,
stop your yappin’ and start your doin’. I’ve heard more chatter back and forth
about what should be done about Isle of Mist or Castle World or whatever, when
all of that creative energy could have been spent on building a newer and better
site, or, perhaps more happily, doing real-world building with blocks of
plastic. Remember those?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
| (...) I totally agree. Pawel and I were going to work on this more privately and hopefully impress others with a more fully realized version than what Pawel has presented so far. I intended to report back immediately to this newsgroup with what was (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
| I would like to take a step toward the New Castle World. I feel a committee should be assembled to decide where CW is going. Therefore, I have started this thread to form the Castle World Committee (CWC). The committee's purpose is not to (...) (21 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
53 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
