 | | Re: Internationalization of the part library?
|
|
(...) I don't think it is really the task of the LSC to define a standard for internationalization (i18n) of part names, but here is a sketch of how I believe it should be handled: + The names found in LDraw files (parts and models) are considered (...) (20 years ago, 28-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Reminder: 2005 Steering Committee Nominations closing soon
|
|
As outlined here: (URL) nominations are about to close. Only those candidates that have been nominated, seconded, and have accepted. as outlined, will be eligible for election. So if you are a candidate that has not yet accepted or declined, please (...) (20 years ago, 28-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Now that the dead-line is approaching, I have to make a decision. Looking at the candidates for this steering committee election and the decisions that are on the horizon, I trust the candidates who already have accepted their nominations to (...) (20 years ago, 28-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) You're probably right. The strictest definition is 1 LDU equals 1/20 the width of a 1x1 brick (whatever that measurement turns out to be). -Orion (20 years ago, 26-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) I was wondering about this number in that otherwise very explanatory and very clear figure when I saw it in the Brickfest presentation. I would strongly argue that Lego, being a Danish creation, is in fact metric by design, and that 1 LDU is (...) (20 years ago, 26-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) Much better! Thanks for that Orion, now I know exactly where to look when I need to remember how many studs per inch ;) ROSCO (20 years ago, 26-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) Darn copy and paste monster struck again. I've fixed it now. -Orion (20 years ago, 26-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) I see your point. I changed the wording and removed the images. -Orion (20 years ago, 26-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) heading ;) ROSCO (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) But what's required by/for the parts library is different from what the basic file format spec lays out. I think it is better (more flexible, easier to write) for the file format to be flexible. When I'm doing rough coding of new parts, I (...) (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) All BFC requires is uniform, non-bowtie winding. While currently the spec doesn't require winding, I see no reason not to revise the new spec to make it a requirement. On the flip side there are many file still left in the loibrary with a (...) (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) Quoting the some of the new winding material: "The points of the quadrilateral must be declared in either a clockwise or counter-clockwise order (see above example images)." The basic file format specification should not include any mention of (...) (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) Have a look now: (URL) added LDU and quad winding. -Orion (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) It may be worth mentioning the winding order for line types 3 and 4. (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
(...) Good point. Thanks for the reminder. Jacob (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | No mention of scale in file format doc
|
|
Regarding the proposed file format document: (URL) is no mention of the scale used by the x/y/z triplets in the various linetypes. I would suggest there should be a paragraph introducing the concept of LDU, and how it relates to bricks and "real (...) (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) On this point, the ONLY way for me to reach the widest amount of people possible is for people who read this message to spread to word. I made a conscious (and correct) decision not to massively cross post this thread to increase exposure. I (...) (20 years ago, 21-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) You are! Sproat agreed very promptly once Orion was able to reach him. (20 years ago, 21-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Hi Jeremy! Yours was one of the names that I figured just wasn't getting through due to something silly like this. I also figured that you'd come through and approve the new agreement so that the parts you created could continue to be (...) (20 years ago, 19-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Posting setup (was Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Yes, if you are a member and you are signed in, as in that case you can be configured so that you do not get the confirmation email, your posts are accepted as is, with the email as configured the last time you went through posting setup (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Now I'm confused. How do you post if the email is invalid? Confirmation email for every post goes to the email address attached to the (possibly spam-blocked) email you list in each post. If the address isn't valid, you don't get the (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Because you hadn't yet went to the URL I pointed to, and/or no human had yet approved it. Reminder, this is it: (URL) and you should remember, there will be a lag, a human has to look at it and decide if it's valid. (...) Here's a hint back, (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) I second this. For some reason, Lugnet isn't using my updated email address in my new posts. (Here's a hint: SPROAT.US is gone, SPROAT.NET works.) The ONLY reason I even knew of this thread is because I went ego-surfing on Lugnet today. (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) For example: (URL) (just the one I picked off the top of my head) Those people that are getting mail but ignoring Orion... why? This is important. The impact to the entire community will be somewhat negative, we may have to run with two (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) For all the asterisked people, yes. This is how I found the bulk majority of the people whose email was unknown. Also, some of the people on the list are still posting here on Lugnet but for whatever reason have not contacted me. This is why I (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
(...) Just wondering if you've tried a Google search using their name (e.g. "Jeff Findley") to see if you can find a new email address. Thanks, Jeff (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
|
It's been a month and a half since the LDraw.org Steering Committee announced the LDraw.org Contributor Agreement. The response has been overwhelming with may positive comments and many old time authors contacting us with their support. We currently (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement
|
|
(...) And that's a good thing. Come on now. The whole ldraw library is a derivative work and we've already lost contact with the original author, and many subsequent part authors, but they still get credit for a job well done. Good work! Keep it up! (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement
|
|
(...) ... but not without acknowledging those works as yours. (...) Chris (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement
|
|
(...) Among other things, yes. (...) Also that. Jacob (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement (Was: New Part...)
|
|
(...) Basically the all this CA is telling you is that you need to agree to release your part under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence for us to accept your part for distribution. The Creative Common Organization is kind enough to provide a (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement (Was: New Part...)
|
|
(...) For example: "The right to create derivative works of the Work" Does that mean altering the works (in this case: editing my dat files and make updates on them) without trying to contact me first? Or does it just mean works that uses my works? (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Tore Eriksson
|
|
(...) Sorry, but I have to decline. Maybe next year. Thanks for the nomination though! /Tore (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Just to clear up a bit of confusion. This nomination is for the Ldraw.org Steering Committee (SteerCo) and not for the LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC). The difference is the SteerCo is responsible for the overall governence of LDraw.org (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thanks, Ross and Timothy, for this (unexpected) nomination. I must decline though because of lack of time. Maybe next time, having a LeoCAD user at the LSC would be nice... Philo (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: File queue of hold voted parts?
|
|
(...) As an admin I will handle the renumbering of ####.dat to ####b.dat, but only if it is brought to my attention. At present I do not get automatically notified of all holds, but this is an enhancement I am working on. Please indicate (either (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: File queue of hold voted parts?
|
|
(...) Relatedly... 1) The only part I've uploaded thus far, a ####a, got a hold vote because it'd require moving the existing #### to ####b (with a ~Moved) file. Is this a valid reason to hold, or something the admin would do if it got approved? I'd (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | File queue of hold voted parts?
|
|
hi, would it be possible to add a second queue to the PT, listing just parts with a hold vote to have an overview how long they are already hang around there? it would be easier to sort out the orphans. w. (20 years ago, 15-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Affirmation
|
|
Hi all, Thanks for all the words of support regarding the LDraw.org Contributer Agreement. We've received quite a few responses but would like to wrap up this issue as quickly as possible. For those who haven't heard of the CA here's the (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thanks ROSCO. Kevin (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thanks Paul. I accepth the nomination. Kevin (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Tore Eriksson
|
|
(...) I am very honoured by the nomiation, but I hesitate to accept it. I want to know a little more about what it takes to be member of the SteerCo. So before I can accept or decline, I need to know what you do and how much work it takes. /Tore (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Steve Bliss, second this nomination. (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Tore Eriksson
|
|
(...) I, Jacob Sparre Andersen, second the nomination. Play well, Jacob (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Travis Cobbs
|
|
I, Willy Tschager, nominate Travis Cobbs. (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Ahui Herrera
|
|
I, Willy Tschager, nominate Ahui Herrera. (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Tore Eriksson
|
|
I, Willy Tschager, nominate Tore Eriksson. (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Willy Tschager
|
|
(...) many thx for the nomination, I accept. w. (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Lars C. Hassing
|
|
(...) Oh--very nice :-) -Tim (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Lars C. Hassing
|
|
(...) Thanks, but I decline - too busy preparing the next L3P release :-) /Lars (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Paul Easter
|
|
(...) Thank you, however, I decline. Paul (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Paul Easter
|
|
(...) I second - Chris (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Dan Boger, nominate Jacob Sparre Andersen. (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Lars C. Hassing
|
|
(...) I, Jacob Sparre Andersen, second the nomination. Play well, Jacob (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Willy Tschager
|
|
(...) I second -Orion (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Lars C. Hassing
|
|
I, Franklin W. Cain, nominate Lars C. Hassing. (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Willy Tschager
|
|
I, Franklin W. Cain, nominate Willy Tschager. (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Paul Easter
|
|
I, Franklin W. Cain, nominate Paul Easter. (20 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org's December Model and Scene of the Month Winners
|
|
Congratulations to the winners of the December Model/Scene of the month contests: (URL) MOTM, Pratt and Whitney R-2800 radial engine, Jorgen Andersson> (URL) SOTM, The long journey home, Tom Beattie> The voting for the January Model of the Month and (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jan-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thanks guys, I accept. -Orion (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thanks, Ross and Tim. I heartily accept this nomination. Steve (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thanks. I graciously accept the nomination and would be happy to continue to serve the LDraw community in this way. Chris (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thanks, guys. I accept the nomination. -Tim (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org 2005 Steering Committee Candidates - A summary
|
|
Hi all. Just as I did (URL) last year> I have (1) put together a summary of the Steering Committee candidates for your reference. You can find it (URL) here>. Right now the nominations, seconds, and acceptances (as followups to (URL) this post>) are (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thank you very much, Paul and Leonard. I accept the nomination with gratitude and would be pleased to serve again if elected. A post will follow separately with a backgrounder and position statement. Larry Pieniazek (from Tampa FL today) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Seconded. (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I second the nomination. -Tim (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Ross Crawford, nominate Philippe Hurbain (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Ross Crawford, nominate Steve Bliss (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I second the nomination of Chris Dee ROSCO (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I second the nomination of Kevin Clague ROSCO (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I second the nomination of Orion Pobursky ROSCO (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I think he's done an excellent job, I will second your nomination. -Leonard Hoffman (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I think he's done an excellent job, I will second your nomination. -Leonard Hoffman (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they’ve done a decent job (IMO), I’d like to re-nominate the current members, including... Chris Dee -gyug (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they've done a decent job (IMO), I'd like to re-nominate the current members, including... Kevin Clague -gyug (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they've done a decent job (IMO), I'd like to re-nominate the current members, including... Larry Pieniazek -gyug (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they've done a decent job (IMO), I'd like to re-nominate the current members, including... Orion Pobursky -gyug (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they've done a decent job (IMO), I'd like to re-nominate the current members, starting with Tim Courtney. (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
Per the LDraw.org Bylaws, Subsection 6.03(a), the 2004 Steering Committee hereby calls for the community to nominate individuals as candidates for the 2005 Steering Committee. Please post nominations in response to this message. Nominations will be (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) I think this hasn't been totally decided yet; the last I heard, SteerCo was still discussing it amongst itself. The two front-runner options are: 1. Possibly have two separate distros, one for 'compliant' and one for 'non-compliant'. The (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) So far it only looks like you're blocked from uploading new parts until you do, but i guess that doesn't apply to orphan parts. -NB (20 years ago, 3-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) just out of curiosity. what will happen if: * an author does NOT agree * an author does NOT reply will his/her parts be deleted from the library and do we have to recreate them? w. (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) Woot! Good work guys! -gyug (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
The LDraw.org Steering Committee is pleased to announce that the Jessiman family has given their consent to go forward with the LDraw.org Contributors Agreement. For those who don't remember, here is a link to the current version of the Contributor (...) (20 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !!
|
| |
| | Re: more detailed Status (of File) in Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) And in the past, I believe replies have universally disagreed with your position. Just to be clear, let me restate my position: Blindly ignoring unofficial fixes to subfiles would allow the PT to certify files for release that reviewers would (...) (20 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | more detailed Status (of File) in Parts Tracker?
|
|
Happy Holidays, Y'all! :D I have brought up, in the past, a point of concern I have with the Status displayed by the Parts Tracker. I have believed, and continue to believe, that a file's Status should be calculated *independently* of whatever (...) (20 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Thanks for the reminder about that! I always forget. Still, a quick "ya we're discussing it" followed by a "what do people think" here doesn't hurt. (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) The LSC mailing list archives are public and a link to them can be found here: (URL) we're not completely out in the open (i.e. discussing policy on Lugnet), our discussions are available for any one who wants to follow along. -Orion (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Hopefully the latter. I did not intend to have any condescending tone in there at all! I'm talking about appropriate process. If you read it in there I must not have done a very good job of communicating and I apologise. Either that or you're (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Actually your (and any other non-LSC member's) input is not wothless and actually has a great influence on what decides. We decided when the LSC first formed that we wouldn't do anything without at least discussing the pros and cons with the (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Yeah, I got the blinking error message in preview and still posted it. I couldn't figure out the problem. Sorry, It must be the .bmp thing. I didn't think of that because they were only 8k apiece, but I can see why you'd want to avoid the (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Don Heyse wrote: (switched to plain text for clarity) Don, I don't think your FTX image embed worked. Did it work when you used preview (you DID use preview, I am sure)? If it did, there's a technical problem somewhere... (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Sorry I'm a bit late to the party (been on vacation) but I think you should submit it. It looks good enough for me. Actually I think it's too good not to submit. Compare your part (as seen in LDRAW): (URL) And this official part (as seen in (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) We're doing everything we can to secure that, behind the scenes, although we don't yet have it, it's only a communication issue, we're pretty sure. I'd rather not go into more detail than that for privacy reasons. (...) That's a key point. We (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) Having an official reference implemention would put us in a better position in several ways. For the parts library, we could resolve a number of nagging issues, like the dithered-colors-have...e-subfiled restriction. For the rendering (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) You have some valid points here but I want to respond to this one specifically. The copyright decision has been made. It was finalized a month and a half ago. What are we waiting for? We're are waiting for consent from the Jessiman's to go (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) I never knew James; I became aware of LDraw a long time after he has passed away. I have no idea what would be best for the file system, the prog, to honour his accomplishments ... actually I don't care about much. I'm not very good in this (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) Excellent point. However there are a lot of (in some ways incompatible) dialects of C. There ARE reference implementations for things like all the Java components (the javac compiler, the java jvm, the jms messaging, jca, the rmi server, etc (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
