LDraw (www.ldraw.org) : 3378


CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 3378	3377 \| 3379

Subject:	Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date:	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 19:19:27 GMT
Viewed:	96 times

In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Larry Pieniazek wrote: > your ftx code: > > > <<http://ldglite.sourceforge.net/3754p90.bmp>> > > gives me this when displayed > > Unable to embed http://ldglite.sourceforge.net/3754p90.bmp in > /cad/dat/parts/?n=5568 Yeah, I got the blinking error message in preview and still posted it. I couldn't figure out the problem. Sorry, It must be the .bmp thing. I didn't think of that because they were only 8k apiece, but I can see why you'd want to avoid the really big ones. It'd be nice if the error message told you that in the preview pane. Oh well. > > Which one looks better? Now I'm not an official reviewer, but I'd > > have to say your part gets my vote. An improperly dithered dark blue > > clearly beats the yucky magenta color 5 used around the numbers in the > > official part. What's up with that? > > Um, unless the standard is relaxed, while I agree that Willy's part > rocks, it doesn't pass the check process as defined. > > That's what I think needs some discussion, whether the dithering > requirement ought to be relaxed or not, rather than how cool Willy > and his part are. And I think it's up to the LSC to lead that > discussion (or let us know they thought about it and don't agree > and here's why)... Wow, did you intentionally put that condescending tone in there, or am I reading too much into it? Must be the nasty blinky red error message that's gotten to me. I hate blinky text. Anyhow, my non-LSC-member (and thus pretty much worthless) opinion is that the dithering requirement should perhaps be relaxed to more of a recommendation than a requirement. After all, even the ldraw.org parts tracker doesn't use the original LDRAW.EXE to render the parts. It uses something more like a portable open source reference implementation of LDRAW.EXE. LSC members, lead us... Have fun, Don

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
(...) Actually your (and any other non-LSC member's) input is not wothless and actually has a great influence on what decides. We decided when the LSC first formed that we wouldn't do anything without at least discussing the pros and cons with the (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

		Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
(...) Hopefully the latter. I did not intend to have any condescending tone in there at all! I'm talking about appropriate process. If you read it in there I must not have done a very good job of communicating and I apologise. Either that or you're (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Don Heyse wrote: (switched to plain text for clarity) Don, I don't think your FTX image embed worked. Did it work when you used preview (you DID use preview, I am sure)? If it did, there's a technical problem somewhere... (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

16 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search