To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 5556
5555  |  5557
Subject: 
Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:09:52 GMT
Viewed: 
4817 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
To James M's point I am pretty sure that if JJ were alive today he'd heartily
agree with it. But not certain.

I never knew James; I became aware of LDraw a long time after he has passed
away. I have no idea what would be best for the file system, the prog, to honour
his accomplishments ... actually I don't care about much. I'm not very good in
this kind of things - to me ldrawing was and is a hobby. may be I'm wrong on his
side, say little sensitive, but that's the way I am.

I'm looking from a very practical point of view and it is sad to say that: we
are currently going nowhere! sorry, if this sounds harsh, but even the LSC is
nothing more than cosmetics, because everything has to be done in prospect of
the backwards compatibility.

I really hoped that the copyright discussion in june, with the aim to separate
the original parts package from 0.27 would be a step forward but it became clear
that there is no will to get rid off the concrete boots ...


That said I certainly support proposals to the LSC to start deviating from the
standard where it makes good technical sense to do so.

count on my vote


THAT said I am sort of sad that Willy decided to hold this part back, not
because he's within his rights to do so, but because I would rather see one
repository for all parts, but especially this one, even incompatible as it is,
because it's really a nifty part. Many repositories makes it harder for users to
find stuff I think.


I'm not holding it back (you can download it form my site) but it does make no
sense submitting it to the PT. it would get hold voted a split second after I
had finished uploading it ... for what? just to add another part to the
kindergarden of hold voted orphan parts? I submit the part immediately after the
specs have been changed. do you have the impression that this is a some sort of
ransom? you are right ;-)

w.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
 
(...) You have some valid points here but I want to respond to this one specifically. The copyright decision has been made. It was finalized a month and a half ago. What are we waiting for? We're are waiting for consent from the Jessiman's to go (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
 
(...) Excellent point. However there are a lot of (in some ways incompatible) dialects of C. There ARE reference implementations for things like all the Java components (the javac compiler, the java jvm, the jms messaging, jca, the rmi server, etc (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

16 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR