LEGO Elements/Parts : 5554


CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 5554	5553 \| 5555

Subject:	Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date:	Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:19:14 GMT
Viewed:	4312 times

In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, James Mastros wrote: > Why not put out a 0.28, with the more trivial restrictions, > this amongst them, removed? If that's impossible for legal > reasons, will somebody step up to the bat, and write a replacement? Why have a replacement at all? The file format stands by itself. There's no reference complier for C code, no reference viewer for the PNG format, and no reference CAD program for the DXF format, why should there be one for the LDraw system? -Orion

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
(...) Excellent point. However there are a lot of (in some ways incompatible) dialects of C. There ARE reference implementations for things like all the Java components (the javac compiler, the java jvm, the jms messaging, jca, the rmi server, etc (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
(...) IIRC, the limit was only on the size of the root directory -- but I could well be wrong. I think there are two separate, and related, questions here: Do we want to keep supporting DOS as a platform? Do we want to keep supporting LDraw 0.27? (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

16 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search