To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 7585
7584  |  7586
Subject: 
Re: MPD spec
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:40:52 GMT
Viewed: 
704 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tore Eriksson wrote:

But if you call the procedure SaveToFile(Path+FileName) to save on the disk,
then the path has to be valid.

Right.  Any "MPD splitter" program should include code to check that
filenames and paths are valid, and either report missing paths, or
create them, or ask the user before creating them, or provide options
(ie, command line parameters) to control how the program should deal
with embedded paths.

(As an experiment, I named a subfile of an MPD file *++0GGG\\\:::00.dutt and
L3Lab had no problems with that. As long as you don't have to write it to
disk, anything seems ok.)

:)

I tried '0 FILE ?'.  It worked just fine.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: MPD spec
 
(...) I don't know how ldglite and other parsers work, but I guess they don't create files with paths and all, but rather objects somewhere in RAM, with 'filenames' just as a property. But if you call the procedure SaveToFile(Path+FileName) to save (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

65 Messages in This Thread:




















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR