Subject:
|
Re: MPD spec
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:27:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1601 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve:
> I think part of the problem is that MPD files are currently being used
> differently than they were originally intended. Rui's ideas would
> benefit a lot of people trying to make use of MPD. But these changes
> would defeat current uses of the format.
Yes.
I think that the right format for these alternative uses is
gzipped tar files. There is Open Source code available for
reading this format, and there is no need to go through a
specification and implementation process.
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL: http://hugin.ldraw.org/LEGO/Skibe/ > --
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: MPD spec
|
| (...) Also agree ! But, lets try to make everybody happy ! ;) (...) I don't quite agree with that, because this new format does not need to be just a way to gather a few DAT files, It can be a lot more, but without forgetting that it should be kept (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: MPD spec
|
| (...) I think part of the problem is that MPD files are currently being used differently than they were originally intended. Rui's ideas would benefit a lot of people trying to make use of MPD. But these changes would defeat current uses of the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
