Subject:
|
Re: MPD spec
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Mar 2000 13:37:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1038 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> They can certainly be discussed by the community, but I will
> be very resistent to changes that don't see as improvements
> of the format.
I think part of the problem is that MPD files are currently being used
differently than they were originally intended. Rui's ideas would
benefit a lot of people trying to make use of MPD. But these changes
would defeat current uses of the format.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: MPD spec
|
| Steve: (...) Yes. I think that the right format for these alternative uses is gzipped tar files. There is Open Source code available for reading this format, and there is no need to go through a specification and implementation process. Play well, (...) (24 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: MPD spec
|
| Rui: (...) I do use it for "batch processing". (...) That's while I added the "NOFILE" meta-command at some point. I think it was Jeremy who made me aware of the need for that. (...) I think you could say so. I wrote the definition and the first (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
