To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 7564
7563  |  7565
Subject: 
Re: MPD spec
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 19:29:59 GMT
Viewed: 
534 times
  
Great!

One question: I think I've seen some MPD files with the extension .dat and
named exactly the same as its main model sub-file. IMHO, it's a risky thing
to do. It's very easy to overwrite the main file with if the mpd is named
the same. (It also makes it more complicated to code utilities supporting
mpd's, which troubles me most :) ) Is there any specification or
recommendation to name mpd's *.MPD and not *.DAT or *.LDR?

/Tore



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: MPD spec
 
(...) I would even call it a bad thing to do. But then I have a habit of putting "FILE" meta-command in all my files, so maybe I should stop criticising and try to fix my own bad habits first. > It's very easy to overwrite the main file with if the (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: MPD spec
 
(...) I don't know if we ever agreed on it; I don't remember the discussion of it at all. But I included it in the page. (...) Oyez, oyez! Please read the new Multi-Part DAT (MPD) Language Extension specification at (URL). All comments, suggestions, (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

65 Messages in This Thread:




















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR