Subject:
|
Re: MPD spec
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:17:06 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
RUI.MARTINS@LINK.PTavoidspam
|
Viewed:
|
1350 times
|
| |
|
|
> I do use it for "batch processing".
OK!
> > but you also run into problems, when something is added to
> > the mail after the MPD file dump.
>
> That's while I added the "NOFILE" meta-command at some
> point. I think it was Jeremy who made me aware of the need
> for that.
Where is that documented ?
Does it have parameters ?
I personally, never heard about that Meta command !
Does a regular (extended) .DAT also suport this or is just an MPD
specific meta command ?
I think it's the later.
[...SNIP. owner stuff ...]
> So far you have been unable to convince me.
I shall try !
But we don't exactly need to extent the MPD format, we can make a new
format !
With new features.
If it could be backwards compatible with MPD than it would be fine. Or
even be called an MPD extension.
some ideias in a mail coming soon.
See ya
Rui Martins
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MPD spec
|
| Rui: (...) I do use it for "batch processing". (...) That's while I added the "NOFILE" meta-command at some point. I think it was Jeremy who made me aware of the need for that. (...) I think you could say so. I wrote the definition and the first (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
65 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
