| |
At 09:35 AM 4/14/99 +0000, Todd Lehman wrote:
8< [...] The mother of all snippage.
> Here is, all things considered, maybe what'll work best:
>
> lugnet.cad CAD
> lugnet.cad.dat.ideas CAD / DAT Files / Ideas
> lugnet.cad.dat.models CAD / DAT Files / Models
> lugnet.cad.dat.parts CAD / DAT Files / Parts
> lugnet.cad.dat.parts.prim CAD / DAT Files / Parts / Primitives
> lugnet.cad.dat.scenes CAD / DAT Files / Scenes
> lugnet.cad.dev CAD / Development
> lugnet.cad.dev.org CAD / Development / ldraw.org
> n/a CAD / LDraw
> n/a CAD / LDraw / Parts
> n/a CAD / LDraw / Tools
> n/a CAD / Ray-Tracing
>
> The last four are newsgroupless categories purely for organizing links on
> the website. I'm sure at some point there would also be virtual categories
> for other software packages as they gain popularity and users and have more
> things to link to like galleries and stuff like that.
>
> Anyway, in this final scenario, .cad.dev.org is the new group, tucked away
> under the protection of .cad.dev. And this also makes semantic sense as the
> new group is a spinoff of .cad.dev and will have many of the same
> participants, although a smaller set. In this scenario, .cad.dev would
> continue to be for development of CAD stuff (primarily LDraw) and
> .cad.dev.org would be for development of ldraw.org specific stuff (primarily
> the website).
>
> Whew. OK. Well, I don't love this last scenario to death or anything but
> it seems practical. Comments/opinions/criticisms?
I like this idea for the heirarchy. However, my choice for group name is
*.org.ldraw
Whether just cad. or cad.dev. goes before it. But it is good tucked away
under .dev.
And as Terry said, you *are* so thorough its scary... :D
Keep Building!!
-Tim <><
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
You've seen their sites and read their posts, now see their faces:
RTL/LUGNET Legofest 1999: http://www.zacktron.com/legofest/
LEGO: SP++++c(6973)[ip++++ bt2++++ ex+++ ft+++ sp+++ ut++]
AQ+++(6175)[an+++ as++ hn-- sr--] TO++[ob+ dv+ tc-- tt-- tjr.---] TC++ CA+
PI+ BV--- DU--- HM--- S+ LS>+++ #++++ Hal M+ A+ YB82m
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: newsgroup name for ldraw.org
|
| (...) Arg. Good point. (...) Why the .org. then? Why not lugnet.trains.pnltc and lugnet.trains.gmltc ? The name is shorter and easier to remember. They are separated from the lugnet.trains group, yet they're still associated with it. (...) Yes, see (...) (27 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
