Subject:
|
Re: The Beeesh
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:39:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1175 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build.mecha, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
> In lugnet.build.mecha, Adrian Drake wrote:
> > Ya know Eric, this is a really cool bot, but for you it's the same old same
> > old. Different fingers, different eyes, different color, but still the same
> > nonetheless. You've perfected the Sophie-Style bot, why not try something
> > new?
>
> I tend to agree with Adrian. This is old hat for you by now.
Sir, get a clue.
I created my first purpose built Mecha in 1988. I have pursued a study in Mecha
building for most of my adult life. I have very personnal reasons for building
the way I do. Your comment is both way off base and incredibly insulting.
> The over-all form is nice, but some parts seem out of scale or out of place
> to me.
>
> The scale issues come from the comparative lengths between arms, legs, and
> torso. I'd expect the legs to be a bit longer and the arms a bit shorter in
> respect to the torso.
>
> Some of the details seem out of place to me - specifically the trans light
> blue windshields. They appear at the joints (knees, elbows) and seem stuck
> on. Like you had them and wanted to use them, but forgot about them til the
> end of the construction. The sand green fingers are similiar in this way.
>
> I really like the head. It has more personality than some of the others.
>
> The feet seems more robotic/squarish than the general style. I'd like to see
> feet that matched the beast aesthetic more.
>
> Thats my general impression.
>
> -Lenny
Further more, based on our past stellar interaction, what makes you think I
would take anything you say to me seriously. Make an attempt to be friendly
towards me and your opinion might carry some sand. Otherwise, you come accorss
as having a big chip on your shoulder.
A chip you took out on my MOC. Get a clue, be nice and be recieved. Act distant
and what makes you think I would want to hear from you. Let alone hear your
ameture comments on a building style you know nothing about. A very personnal
area for me and you trump on it like you have the knowledge.
Go away Mr. Hoffman. Come back when you have something nice to say and you have
taken the time to learn about my mission and my chosen style of building.
What I make is for me and does not require your opinion.
In all fairness, the legs should be 2 studs taller and yes the trans canopies do
seem stuck on. I didn't hit the mark with those areas. So what.
Its when you chime in peppering your post with insults that erks me.
Your nomination to "cut Sophie down to size" title has been revoked.
Review your last MOC post/replies. Your game with me is over.
LOL, all of this comming from a person that said to me, "it never ocurred to me
to use a worm gear as a one way joint, until I saw Mark Nuemann's Hammer."
Or, "I didn't realize your (Eric Sophie's) Mecha were all mini-fig scale."
Do you see why I see your critique as laughable and later insulting?
Really, I won't give up what I love. Don't even try.
e
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Beeesh
|
| (...) Are you calling me out because I dont understand worm gears? Are you calling me out because I never saw the minifigs sitting in your mecha? Because I thought your mecha were more artistic sculptures than the silly minifig scale stuff I do? (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Beeesh
|
| (...) I tend to agree with Adrian. This is old hat for you by now. The over-all form is nice, but some parts seem out of scale or out of place to me. The scale issues come from the comparative lengths between arms, legs, and torso. I'd expect the (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
95 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
