Subject:
|
Re: The Beeesh
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:58:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1355 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
I’m talking about the designs and the style, not the gearing technology,
which I dont particularly understand (nor really care about, honestly).
|
That’s a shame, because articulation is at least half of what defines a good
mech. It’s akin to ignoring SNOT work or greebling that is particuarily well
done.
| |
For myself, it is the person who thinks my art is not very good that I pay
the most attention to, ask questions of, and inspires me to get better.
|
Fair enough, (exactly what I do as well) but I’m just voicing the flip side of
this coin, which is be mindful of how you can improve but always build for
yourself, not the critics.
Mark Neumann
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Beeesh
|
| (...) Not so. Greeblings and SNOT work are both directly related to style and design. Articulation is more about the mechanics, and while it can effect design, it isn't the focus of design. The specifics of how the SNOT work is done (ie, using 1x1 (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Beeesh
|
| (...) I'm talking about the designs and the style, not the gearing technology, which I dont particularly understand (nor really care about, honestly). (...) Judging by Eric's reply to me(1), I really don't think Eric cares one iota about my opinion. (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
95 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
