Subject:
|
Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Jan 1999 20:32:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1430 times
|
| |
|
|
blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes:
> [...]
>
> > What are the arguments again -for- having shopping stuff inside the .market
> > hierarchy?
>
> Convenience, convenience, convenience. Not that it should be overrated.
>
> Oh, yeah. It builds a deeper ng-tree, rather than a wider one.
Deep vs. wide -- do you mean deeper is better than wider? (Is the "Oh,
yeah" a point or a counter-point?)
I don't have any inherent dislike for deep ng trees as long as the ng names
remain: (a) type-able, (b) remember-able, (c) readable, and (d) short
enough not to clutter up the news-browsing web pages that display their
names. Then again I don't have any inherent dislike for wide ng trees
either. And certainly someday it's possible there'll be a super-wide tree
of theme-specific ng's.
--Todd
p.s. I assume that by "wide tree" you mean wide in the classic CS sense --
which actually turns out to mean "tall" in the user-oriented sense. "Deep"
and "depth" in the classic CS sense map to "wide" and "length" (ng name
length) in the user sense. (Oh jeez, this is confuzzing... :)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials
|
| (...) Oops, sorry. My misunderstanding. (...) Well, that is open to discussion. I don't have a strong opinion on lugnet.market.lsahs.specials or lugnet.shopping.lsahs.specials. (...) Good point. (...) I guess that's what I was suggesting as a (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
