Subject:
|
Re: LUGNET Channels (Was: Lugnet for beginners)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Mar 2000 22:20:36 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@io.[antispam]com
|
Viewed:
|
1031 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> So, to answer Jeremy's question: The issue of disk space is moot because
> CGI output isn't actually cached (not at lugnet.com anyway). If some other
> server downstream (say, a proxy server) is caching it, that's a *MAJOR*
> problem which needs to be fixed and is likely to have been broken for many
> many moons.
Okay, I'm confused. Please see my response at
http://www.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=4869
which refers to a conversation we had last May:
http://www.lugnet.com/faq/?n=269
In particular, I'm confused about "transparent caching", which I understood to
be a function on LUGNET, rather than a proxy or the client.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
Card-carrying member of the Star-Bellied Sneech Preservation Society
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LUGNET Channels (Was: Lugnet for beginners)
|
| (...) OH, I see what you mean now. No, the "transparent caching" (meaning internal intermedia results only -- not external results) is not a function of the server. It could be, and probably someday will be (if it needs to be), but it isn't that way (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LUGNET Channels (Was: Lugnet for beginners)
|
| (...) Oh, yes, that kind of caching. That kind of caching _should_ be happening, yes. If that's what Jeremy's seeing, then that's the intended behavior (just like any other static .html page). Oops, I snipped too much of what Jeremy wrote when I (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
63 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
