To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.laflrcOpen lugnet.org.us.laflrc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / LafLRC / 415
414  |  416
Subject: 
Re: Rock Crawling
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
Date: 
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:22:46 GMT
Viewed: 
5675 times
  
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, David Koudys wrote:

And I like the ability to have 10 motors in 1 bot using 1 RCX.  When John
develops a multiplexor to sell for the NXT so I can have more than 1 motor
connected to one output, maybe I'll look into buying one.  As it stands (and as
I can afford), I'll stay with the RCX's (for now) :)

So, I'm wondering about the NXT's ability to command the RCX.  How possible is
the following:  I know that I can hook up motors to my RCX sensor ports and vice
versa.  They might not work doing anything really practical but they can be
hooked up.  If I hook up an rcx motor to a sensor port on the rcx, and tell the
sensor port that it is really some kind of sensor, and then spin the motor, I
think I remember the rcx being about to tell that there is something at the end
of the line generating some current.  Yeah, my details are fuzzy but I'm sure
someone has done this too.

So, why not tell the nxt to use an 'old rcx motor' block (or whatever it is
called) and use that to send information down one of the nxt wires, into a
conversion wire, into a port on the rcx.  Then the nxt could tell the rcx what
to do.

Yeah, I haven't tried it, but I'm sure there is some combination of output from
the nxt that could be interpretted by an rcx.

Now, I have no idea why anyone would want to do that, but that's not my job
here.

In keeping with what is becoming common practice,
Rafe "All you have to do swim inside, jam a pebble in the fan, and swim out.
Once you do that, this tank is going to get filthier and filthier, and the
dentist will have no choice but to clean the tank himself. He'll put us in
individual baggies, then we roll out the window, down to the ground, across the
street, and into the ocean. It's foolproof!" Donahue



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: NXT2RCX
 
At 12:22 PM 1/12/07, Rafe Donahue wrote: Nemo, (...) I think this is possible, and would work, at least as well as it did on the RCX. A simple conversion cable could be connected to both. I believe the wires that would be connected would act just (...) (17 years ago, 12-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Rock Crawling
 
(...) 'cause I like building robots with brick-plate-plate-brick studded construction. And I like the ability to have 10 motors in 1 bot using 1 RCX. When John develops a multiplexor to sell for the NXT so I can have more than 1 motor connected to (...) (17 years ago, 12-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)

43 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR