Subject:
|
Re: A fan no more
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:53:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5321 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jindrich Kubec wrote:
> I've read somewhere that putting the studs in Technic holes is not a
> recommended technique. It does wear the parts too much.
It's true that it's not recommended. The TECHNIC hole is smaller in diameter
than the inside of a 1x1 round brick, which is what allows TECHNIC pins to be
inserted into round bricks without damaging the split tip. That doesn't mean it
doesn't work. Many of the more interesting construction techniques aren't
exactly brick-friendly, but they work in situations where nothing else will.
Just don't stick a 1x1 round cone into any TECHNIC holes.
> I don't think that anybody argues on usefulness of studless beams.
I do. Orion does. Heck, Kevin's pretty much the poster-child for what can be
accomplished with stud-free construction.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A fan no more
|
| (...) Hey, this is a my clumsy pidgin, sorry, I'll try to reiterate ;-) I just wanted to say that most people admit that studless beams may be useful sometimes and that people are usually not against studless beams, but against studless sets. For (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A fan no more
|
| (...) Where exactly? No studded beams in 8436, 8451, 8453, 8454, 8441, 8455, 8434, 8433, 8435. These are 'Technic' sets from last 2 years. (...) I don't think the people have issues with studless beams per se. I think they have issues with (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
